Home The Pope's Special Forces
The Pope's Special Forces Print
Written by Muhammad Tahir   
Friday, 29 February 2008 20:21

JumahPulseJane's, the world's premier provider of military and strategic intelligence, describes Special Forces personnel (e.g. the SAS) in the following terms:

"These soldiers are different: they have to be intelligent, lateral thinkers, superbly fit and have the mindset that keeps them going when others would give up."

Such soldiers have historically been used to go "behind enemy lines" in order to assist indigenous groups to organise rebellions, insurgencies and the like. Using their knowledge and expertise (and staying well out of sight), they are often able to leverage local resources to achieve goals that an outside power could never accomplish by deploying a standard invading army. While Special Forces personnel are often celebrated once their objectives have been accomplished, as was seen in the immediate aftermath of the fall of the Taliban in 2002, usually their presence during active operations is well concealed.

Felix KoernerSo the media launch of a certain Felix Koerner on the BBC came as something of a surprise. He is a prime mover in the Turkish secularist establishment's latest attack on Islam.

First of all, some background. You will have done well to miss the media frenzy surrounding the announcement by the "Ankara school" of Turkish orientalists of their intentions to revisit the entire corpus of hadith literature in order to determine which ahadith (plural of "hadith") are truly authentic. Apologies at this point must go to Imam Bukhari and those many thousand other muhadditheen (hadith experts) who have tirelessly dedicated their lives to this task over the past 1400 years (the Turks should have the whole job wrapped up in a year or two...).

How might these esteemed Turkish academics be able to finish the job so quickly? The answer is simple: instead of getting bogged down in the multiple sciences pertaining to the chains of hadith transmission and all of the elaborate criteria that have been established and agreed upon by the consensus of 1400 years worth of Islamic scholarship, they have discovered a new, streamlined criterion for assessing the soundness of ahadith:

"...[these texts] must be understood in the historical context of the seventh century. Since they date from this period, today they must be read anew word by word for the twenty-first century."

Or, stated more bluntly, "the Turkish state has come to see the Hadith as having an often negative influence on a society it is in a hurry to modernise," (emphasis added) and has therefore commissioned this group of academics to attempt to reinterpret or indeed remove those ahadith that might impede the project of modernisation.

So what does this have to do with Special Forces? An anecdote may shed some light on the situation:

Father Peter-Hans Kolvenbach was once strolling in the Vatican Gardens when he spotted Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger beckoning to him. He hurried over, only to be introduced to a clutter of feral cats fussing around the feet of the then Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. "You see, Father-General, this is the audience that listens to me," joked Ratzinger.

The story might seem banal, but it illustrates the close relationship between Ratzinger, now the Pope, and Kolvenbach, the then leader of the Jesuit Order. Ratzinger and Kolvenbach are also known through their offices as the "white pope" and the "black pope" - the former being the Pope we all know and love, the latter being the shadowy leader of the most powerful and influential order of the Catholic Church (even though the order has fewer than 20,000 members worldwide).

Who are the Jesuits? One revealing description states them to be "what was effectively an elite force of intellectual missionary priests... always at the service of the universal Church."

John Ralston Saul, in his book Voltaire's Bastards, describes the Jesuits as "intellectual mercenaries", whose intellectual talents were placed at the Church's disposal to achieve whatever ends the Church required. He argues that they are the originators of the "tyranny of Reason" - the modern day trap of horrible outcomes (the Holocaust, the nuclear bomb, the global arms industry) which arise from perfectly sound logical thought processes.

Any guesses as to Felix Koerner's religious affiliations?

It appears that Koerner has spent the last few years befriending and "advising" the Ankara school of would-be revisionists whilst at the same time ministering in a state-sanctioned church of Turkey (no high-up government connections there then...). In fact, Koerner's recently published book, "Revisionist Koran Hermeneutics in Contemporary Turkish University Theology: Rethinking Islam", focuses on the current status of post-modernist methods in Turkish intellectual discourse about Islam. Specifically, Koerner concerns himself with how to infect his Turkish "disciples" with the types of discourse which have led to the current and ongoing disintegration of the Christian Church.

Revealingly, Koerner praises Mehmet Paçaci for being "admirably courageous... in taking up the ideas of non-Muslim authors. He has thus substantially opened up the dialogue between modernity and Islam" (pp 107–8, Revisionist Koran Hermeneutics...).

Paçaci should be more appropriately praised for being admirably unimaginative. Even Koerner himself complains that his Turkish counterparts still need to move beyond Fazlur Rahman and his 20-year old ideas about "Islam as Ethics". Apart from the fact that Fazlur Rahman was an Oxford-trained orientalist who was schooled in the arts of criticising the Quran and Islam by H.A.R. Gibb and Van Der Bergh, if there was any doubt that this latest episode was a western, foreign-run invasion of Islam's intellectual territory, Koerner's comments reveal the truth.

Koerner also inadvertently reveals some other important truths at play: specifically that this particular "initiative" to revamp Islam is nothing new. The ideas and methods being discussed are over 20 years old. What is new is the attempt to pass them off as genuine indigenous attempts at Islamic renewal by coaching and promoting "Muslim scholars" to champion them.

This of course ignores the fundamental fact that the established and complex discipline of al-jarh wa al-ta'dil (the science of rigorous scrutiny and authentication) arose out of the need to refute attempts to manipulate the hadith literature by anti-Muslim forces. Koerner is sorely mistaken if he thinks a bit of chit chat with (at best) marginal Muslim orientalists, heavily influenced by the "Oxford school" of failed Islam deconstruction attempts and a sad lot to begin with, is going to unravel 1400 years of solid Muslim scholarship that has been dealing with this very same issue.

The "real story" in this week's media extravaganza has in fact not been the plan itself, but Koerner's prominent role in the whole charade. It has been surprising to witness the sheer arrogance which has been shown by his sponsors, who have openly advertised the fact that the Church's "special forces" are actively at work in Turkey to drive forward a centuries-old dream of both major churches: deconstruct Islam from within by its own hands so that it disintegrates into millions of "individualised" versions irreconcilable with one another.

The coterie of academics that Koerner has gathered around himself is unremarkable and are nothing new: self-hating Muslim orientalists (there's a real oxymoron for you). What makes them different is the help they're getting from none other than the Pope himself.

And for those of you who might think that we here at UmmahPulse are just paranoid, please note that when the Pope visited Ankara in November 2006, we were watching and listening as his colleagues declared that the "80-year-old German theologian known for his sharp intellect -- has a much broader agenda than merely improving ties between Catholics and Orthodox Christians. Part of that agenda is an attempt to help spark Islamic theological reform."

We were also listening when his loyal lieutenant Felix Koerner explained that he believes the talks mark a sort of milestone. "This will be a new level of dialogue, which will also certainly be institutionalized during this meeting," he said. "We will then bring together our various committees together on a regular basis and things like that."

Before the Western press gets too giddy about the prospects of a Muslim reformation emanating from Turkey and propagating around the world, it should reflect on the irony in the pall these Turkish orientalists have attempted to cast over the legacy of a hundred thousand muhadditheen:

"[The] Leaders of the Hadith Project say successive generations have embellished the text, attributing their political aims to the Prophet Muhammad himself."

Interestingly enough, I couldn't think of a better description for Koerner and his disciples.

"They (the disbelievers) wish to extinguish Allah's light with their mouths, but Allah will only allow that His light should be perfected, no matter how much the disbelievers may detest (it)." (Quran 9:32)

Comments (14)Add Comment
...
written by cradle2grave , March 01, 2008
Very useful insight, may Allah reward you - if you don\'t mind I will post this article on the www.easy-talk.org site do others can benefit. Of course I shall be attributing it to UmmahPulse
...
written by SSK , March 01, 2008
It seems like the West is using Turkey\'s entry into EU as bargaining counter for reforming Islam. The real sick part of this plan is that Turkey will never be allowed to enter the EU. There is too much opposition to it among the Europeans including the Pope!!!
...
written by Majid786 , March 01, 2008
SubhanAllah. By far the most researched and objective analysis of the Turkish \'Hadith Project\' that I\'ve read. Compared to the simplistic and intellectual laziness of commentators like Ali Eteraz on the Guardian blog \'Comment is Free\' , this is an outstanding piece. The project of \'reformation\' is in full swing and will Inshaala, meet the end it deserves: failure. Jazak-Allah-Kher Ummah Pulse.......
...
written by Idris , March 01, 2008
Subhanallah, another brilliant one by Ummah Pulse. Allah reward you.
...
written by uzbek , March 02, 2008
i have just discovered your site and this article is the first article I read. excelent, thank you
...
written by abutalha , March 03, 2008
Jazak-Allah Kahir- excellent article. Now if you look at the controversy created by Dr Williams in UK and this project in Turkey – it suggests that these kuffar have planned all this to create an atmosphere against Islam so to put doubt into Muslim’s Aqeeda and to divert them from the truth. This is nothing new and Ishallah no doubt this is going FAIL.
...
written by Mike Edgar , March 10, 2008
By attacking the Turkish \"assault on Islam\" you are protecting all Muslims from the alien concepts the revisionists will be propagating, e.g. respect for women as the equal of men, freedom of individual conscience, abandonment of judicial violence etc.
...
written by Angry Chicken , March 11, 2008
Mike - it is obvious that you have a completely improverished understanding of Islam. You imply that Muslims and Islam have to be \'civilised\' by the west via this Turkish reformation. This is both insulting and inaccurate. I would suggest that you should educate yourself about Islam a bit more. I know that this is difficult in the current climate of Muslim-bashing but I am sure that if you approach your local mosque and request some information, you will be pointed in the right direction. If that doesn\'t work then try organisations like IPCI (birmingham based).
...
written by George Carty , March 11, 2008
Aren\'t some of the Muslim laws out of date though? For example, the prohibition of women travelling alone made sense in the Prophet\'s day due to the danger of attack by bandits. These days however the cities are far more dangerous than the countryside. Similarly, the division of the world into \"Dar al-Islam\" (lands under Muslim rule) and \"Dar al-Harb\" (enemy lands) made sense in the medieval era (because most non-Muslim states - especially those of Christendom - forbade the practice of Islam in their territories), but is unjustifiable today.
...
written by Majid786 , March 11, 2008
@George Carty Come on....lets get a bit of depth here! What has the strategy of reformation got to do with labels like Dar al-Harb? when it comes to Islam, as far as I understand, there is existing methods within scholarship to understand and apply rulings on \'new\' events / episodes / issues. Unfortunately you are mixing up several issues here. A reformation is all about reducing Islam to a private domain and to personal interpretations of text. It reflects an absolutism which is inherent in a secular creed.
...
written by MAE , March 26, 2008
To George Carty In which world are u living. A woman is more in danger in these times than during those times. Women are more sexually harassed now. In the west. A woman is a sexual object. See your porn sites of what is done to women. It is a shame. Female liberty means adultery and fornication which is absolutely prohibited in Islam. Kennedy, Clinton, Christian evangelists etc. are known to be womanizers. Yet they scorn when the people of paradise will attain 70 or more damsels. Western laws are out of date. In Islam women are respected, so much so paradise lies under the feet of mother\'s. Islam is the only alternative to western culture. It does not lie or deceive like of what is happening in the Middle East and Muslim lands.
...
written by Gene in NYC , June 03, 2008
If most of the comments here are anything to go by, the author of this commentary is right: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JF03Ak02.html
...
written by Muhammad Garba-Abj. Nigeria , August 01, 2008
This is a great site that has a lot of resources that will benefit the ummah,a good expository that cleary show the machination of the kuffars against islam but they will never succeed. The writer s a great scholar, jakallahu khairan.
...
written by Expert Jesuit and Imperial Researcher , November 30, 2009
The Jesuits are no doubt the Popes Special Forces.
But who was really ultimately behind their creation?
There was a driving force behind Loyola, who was it?
A: Francis Borgia, from the court of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V.
You see Spain was never going to have another White Pope because of Borgias ancestor Rodrigo Borgia aka Pope Alexander VI.

And Germany was to never have another Pope whilst the Holy Roman Empire was there. They had a string of German Popes that lived only a couple years before they introduced the Investiture Controversy. German Popes upset the balance of power in Europe as they were little more than puppets for the Emperor.

But the Empire moved to Spain after Charles II was too retarded to reproduce due to all the inbreeding in the Habsburg family. So ever since then the Emperor was based out of Spain, but after their Emperor puppet Popes got Rome sacked, Spain was never to have another Pope either.

So what to do if you are the Spanish Emperor Charles V?
How about create a Society within the Vatican that has its own Pope!
And have them be in charge of the Popes armies and most prestigious universities.

Francis Borgia did go on to become the 3rd Black Pope after all.
The Holy Roman Empire never went anywhere but behind the curtain after Napoleon. Look around you. We have a German Pope and Spanish Black Pope.
The current Holy Roman Emperor is King Juan Carlos and possibly Otto von Habsburg as well and they rule through secrecy via their Order of the Golden Fleece, in which Juan Carlos is the head of the Spanish Order and Otto von Habsburg is head of the Austrian Order.

Who killed JFK?
The CIA?
The Mafia?
The Secret Service?
Try all of them.
All of these had direct Jesuit ties.
The Head of the Secret Service James Rowley was deeply Jesuit connected and had a Jesuit Priest brother named Francis.
The head of the CIA Allen Dulles, whom JFK fired, had a Jesuit CARDINAL nephew named Avery.
The Jesuits Priests are the ones mafia dons would go to in order to confess their sins, who else would they go to?

JFK forced James J Rowley to take on his first black agent, Abraham Boldin mere months before he was killed. The Secret Service was notoriously racist, and Catholic. Boldin foiled an attempt in Jesuit/Mafia owned Chicago, but they ramped up the racial pressure against Boldin and forced him to quit, and they got JFK in Dallas after all the agents were encouraged to get drunk the night before.

Who do you all think was behind the death of Pope John Paul I?
And the attempt on Pope John Paul II?
And the attempt on Reagan the month before that?
What happened to the Black Pope after the attempt on Pope John Paul II failed?
Isnt it rather suspicious and coincidental that Pedro Arrupe went on vacation in the "Far East"(Japan), and once his plane landed back on Vatican soil he suffered "a stroke" from being so overjoyed to be back?

Im sure he was so thrilled to be back he had a stroke that left him more or less a vegetable that was kept under close supervision for his remaining days.

THEN Pope John Paul II takes the unprecedented step of naming the Jesuits successor for them? Thats never been done before. And not only did he do it once, but twice he named temporary Black Popes. Im thinking the 1st got scared for his life and requested a new, and safer duty station.

Im also thinking the Jesuits had to get the approval from JPII on Kolvenbach.
Who coincidentally enough stepped down from his position after JPII passed, and Kolvenbach made way for Arrupe's protege Adolfo Nicholas, who was supposed to have replaced Arrupe. Adolfo was Arrupes trusted barber and while he groomed his Black Pope, the Black Pope was grooming him as his replacement.

But do not listen to me, I am just a conspiracy theorist.
When I see 6 Roman Catholics out of 9 Supreme Court Justices, with 4 of them being Opus Dei, I see a conspiracy. When 2 more are Jewish with 1 being married to a Jesuit Professor and the other recieving Jesuit awards from Santa Clara... I see a conspiracy. When Americas most notorious spy FBI agent Robert Hanssen is Opus Dei, went to the same church and shared the same Spiritual Adviser with his boss FBI Director Louis Freeh, and Justice Scalia and Thomas... how can I see anything else but a conspiracy?

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
 

Latest Comments

Cameron and the Muslim Vote (Part IV)
All the more reason to work to ensure that we get a hung parliament so that these dangerous goofs and closet racists and Islamophobes don't get their
Islamophobia – Making Fools out of the Cleverest of People
Excellent article. It is important to highlight such attacks on Muslims through all these different channels, and Maash'Allah the article hits the spo
Islamophobia – Making Fools out of the Cleverest of People
A very pertinent analysis; identifying a new wave of Islamaphobia being unleashed. Ironically the public discourse this week has been focussed on the
"Tolerant Britain" - Uncomfortable Statistics for British Muslims
Looking at these figures one realises that the British public is not more tolerant but quite the opposite. Other findings were that the level of new
"Tolerant Britain" - Uncomfortable Statistics for British Muslims
Douglas Murray will be very pleased with this result.....it is exactly what he is agitating for. In their blind advocacy of Israel, these zionists see
"Tolerant Britain" - Uncomfortable Statistics for British Muslims
This article should be forwarded to Douglas Murray of CSC. For him and his cronies, the new tolerance is intolerance. @Abdullah: You hit the nail on
"Tolerant Britain" - Uncomfortable Statistics for British Muslims
Excellent piece of journalism. We are new jews but the only difference is that the jews in germany knew it. We Muslims are still in denial of our pred
"Tolerant Britain" - Uncomfortable Statistics for British Muslims
Send this article to all the newspapers. its sickening how they could do this and get away with it.
World Economic Crisis and Neocon Greed (Part III)
I am aware of Wanniski's comments on Farakhan and Saddam but I did not mention them for brevity's sake. These and many more, are examples of what I d
The Month of Safar
ASLAM O ALIKUN sorry but i m just confused about the the real fact of this months because in many books and in many website i found contradiction to